Comments for Stefan Juhl http://stefanjuhl.com Tue, 13 May 2008 06:20:02 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4 Comment on How to rank #1 on Google image search by Stefan Juhl http://stefanjuhl.com/2008/image-search-rankings/#comment-64000 Mon, 12 May 2008 01:28:44 +0000 http://stefanjuhl.com/2008/image-search-rankings/#comment-64000 David, yeah the s word did bring in a few visits ;-) It's good in Cyprus, I really have a great time here. Unfortunately I'll be heading back to Denmark soon. But I'm working on some new exciting plans for the next year(s). David, yeah the s word did bring in a few visits ;-)

It’s good in Cyprus, I really have a great time here. Unfortunately I’ll be heading back to Denmark soon. But I’m working on some new exciting plans for the next year(s).

]]> Comment on How to rank #1 on Google image search by dk http://stefanjuhl.com/2008/image-search-rankings/#comment-63982 Sun, 11 May 2008 21:44:28 +0000 http://stefanjuhl.com/2008/image-search-rankings/#comment-63982 Interesting. I had never even thought about what it took to rank for a search term. Ranking number one for the s word probably resulted in a few clicks, eh? How is the island treating you these days? Much Love, dk Interesting. I had never even thought about what it took to rank for a search term.

Ranking number one for the s word probably resulted in a few clicks, eh?

How is the island treating you these days?

Much Love,
dk

]]> Comment on How to rank #1 on Google image search by Stefan Juhl http://stefanjuhl.com/2008/image-search-rankings/#comment-63608 Thu, 08 May 2008 19:45:51 +0000 http://stefanjuhl.com/2008/image-search-rankings/#comment-63608 Yeah definitely interesting, though as I understand it's mainly for refining the search results by identifying irrelevant images. So one still needs to get the images ranked first. Yeah definitely interesting, though as I understand it’s mainly for refining the search results by identifying irrelevant images. So one still needs to get the images ranked first.

]]> Comment on Don’t Lose Your Google Image Search Traffic by Pete http://stefanjuhl.com/2007/dont-lose-image-search-traffic/#comment-61898 Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:40:45 +0000 http://stefanjuhl.com/2007/dont-lose-image-search-traffic/#comment-61898 I site I'm updating gets a huge amount of Google image search hits. I think if you don't disable the back button this is a great way of retaining some of the otherwise useless traffic. I site I’m updating gets a huge amount of Google image search hits. I think if you don’t disable the back button this is a great way of retaining some of the otherwise useless traffic.

]]> Comment on How to rank #1 on Google image search by Alex http://stefanjuhl.com/2008/image-search-rankings/#comment-61793 Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:18:53 +0000 http://stefanjuhl.com/2008/image-search-rankings/#comment-61793 You might want to check this out.. he specifically talks about Google Image Search about 3 minutes into his presentation.. http://omnisio.com/startupschool08/peter-norvig-at-startup-school-08 You might want to check this out.. he specifically talks about Google Image Search about 3 minutes into his presentation..

http://omnisio.com/startupschool08/peter-norvig-at-startup-school-08

]]> Comment on Don’t Lose Your Google Image Search Traffic by jd http://stefanjuhl.com/2007/dont-lose-image-search-traffic/#comment-61516 Sat, 19 Apr 2008 03:11:09 +0000 http://stefanjuhl.com/2007/dont-lose-image-search-traffic/#comment-61516 To Me: I totally disagree with your malware statement. Let me pose something your way. How would you like it if you had a site and Google framed your keyword results? doubt you'd like it. Well then why should they frame image results? This is something google should quit doing. Quit framing image results... To Me:
I totally disagree with your malware statement. Let me pose something your way. How would you like it if you had a site and Google framed your keyword results? doubt you’d like it. Well then why should they frame image results?

This is something google should quit doing. Quit framing image results…

]]> Comment on The 6 Essential Elements of A Great Website Widget by Bo Buchanan http://stefanjuhl.com/2007/essential-elements-of-widgets/#comment-61268 Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:40:42 +0000 http://stefanjuhl.com/2007/essential-elements-of-widgets/#comment-61268 Awesome list of widget essentials! I've included a link to your widget list in my blog! Awesome list of widget essentials! I’ve included a link to your widget list in my blog!

]]> Comment on Don’t Lose Your Google Image Search Traffic by Stefan Juhl http://stefanjuhl.com/2007/dont-lose-image-search-traffic/#comment-61241 Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:57:59 +0000 http://stefanjuhl.com/2007/dont-lose-image-search-traffic/#comment-61241 Me, I disagree since the only thing a user miss out on is Google's framing of a given page. It mainly has to do with Google and not the users. Comparing it to malware is just plain stupid. Me, I disagree since the only thing a user miss out on is Google’s framing of a given page. It mainly has to do with Google and not the users. Comparing it to malware is just plain stupid.

]]> Comment on Don’t Lose Your Google Image Search Traffic by Me http://stefanjuhl.com/2007/dont-lose-image-search-traffic/#comment-61225 Wed, 16 Apr 2008 06:34:24 +0000 http://stefanjuhl.com/2007/dont-lose-image-search-traffic/#comment-61225 Web masters! Please stop using this technique. It is immoral. I leave sites which use this technique immediately. By using this you are taking control away from the user and that is no better than what malware does. Web masters!
Please stop using this technique. It is immoral.
I leave sites which use this technique immediately.
By using this you are taking control away from the user and that is no better than what malware does.

]]> Comment on Don’t Lose Your Google Image Search Traffic by DesignerElla http://stefanjuhl.com/2007/dont-lose-image-search-traffic/#comment-61108 Tue, 15 Apr 2008 08:06:45 +0000 http://stefanjuhl.com/2007/dont-lose-image-search-traffic/#comment-61108 Thanks! It works well. Mine loads a bit slowly, but it works. If you want to test it, search for " coach bag " and click on one of the results under " colour-dreams.net ". Thanks! I will be watching carefully for lowering in rank, but I get soooooooooooooooo many Google Image searches, and I just noticed this happening on The Superficial and similar sites, so I decided I must have it. Thanks! It works well. Mine loads a bit slowly, but it works. If you want to test it, search for ” coach bag ” and click on one of the results under ” colour-dreams.net “.

Thanks! I will be watching carefully for lowering in rank, but I get soooooooooooooooo many Google Image searches, and I just noticed this happening on The Superficial and similar sites, so I decided I must have it.

]]> Comment on Don’t Lose Your Google Image Search Traffic by Stefan Juhl http://stefanjuhl.com/2007/dont-lose-image-search-traffic/#comment-59388 Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:32:31 +0000 http://stefanjuhl.com/2007/dont-lose-image-search-traffic/#comment-59388 Khalid, there are no reviews except the ones on this page. Khalid, there are no reviews except the ones on this page.

]]> Comment on Don’t Lose Your Google Image Search Traffic by Mickey J Barczyk http://stefanjuhl.com/2007/dont-lose-image-search-traffic/#comment-59023 Fri, 28 Mar 2008 03:37:24 +0000 http://stefanjuhl.com/2007/dont-lose-image-search-traffic/#comment-59023 Thx Stefan, Im gonna try it out. Thx Stefan, Im gonna try it out.

]]> Comment on Don’t Lose Your Google Image Search Traffic by Khalid http://stefanjuhl.com/2007/dont-lose-image-search-traffic/#comment-58857 Thu, 27 Mar 2008 04:34:13 +0000 http://stefanjuhl.com/2007/dont-lose-image-search-traffic/#comment-58857 Stefan, thanks for the prompt reply, has there been any further reviews yet? I am curious to know the long term effects, both on traffic and seo. Thanks, Khalid. Stefan, thanks for the prompt reply, has there been any further reviews yet? I am curious to know the long term effects, both on traffic and seo.

Thanks,

Khalid.

]]> Comment on Don’t Lose Your Google Image Search Traffic by Stefan Juhl http://stefanjuhl.com/2007/dont-lose-image-search-traffic/#comment-58815 Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:58:44 +0000 http://stefanjuhl.com/2007/dont-lose-image-search-traffic/#comment-58815 Khalid, yes you could just put it somewhere in between <head> and </head> in header.php Khalid, yes you could just put it somewhere in between <head> and </head> in header.php

]]> Comment on Don’t Lose Your Google Image Search Traffic by Stefan Juhl http://stefanjuhl.com/2007/dont-lose-image-search-traffic/#comment-58814 Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:52:42 +0000 http://stefanjuhl.com/2007/dont-lose-image-search-traffic/#comment-58814 Mickey, it would look like the below, but with the domain of the site that's allowed to frame a page, instead of WWW.DOMAIN.COM: <code> <script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript"> var loc = top.location.href; var ls = loc.indexOf("//"); var ds = ls + 2; var wr = loc.substring(ds, loc.length); var ns = wr.indexOf("/"); var domain = wr.substring(0, ns); if ((top.location!=self.location) && (domain!="WWW.DOMAIN.COM")) top.location.replace(self.location); </script> </code> I haven't tested the above code, so you might need to mess a bit with it. Also note that the script needs improvement if the allowed site uses multiple subdomains. Mickey, it would look like the below, but with the domain of the site that’s allowed to frame a page, instead of WWW.DOMAIN.COM:


<script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript">
var loc = top.location.href;
var ls = loc.indexOf("//");
var ds = ls + 2;
var wr = loc.substring(ds, loc.length);
var ns = wr.indexOf("/");
var domain = wr.substring(0, ns);
if ((top.location!=self.location) && (domain!="WWW.DOMAIN.COM")) top.location.replace(self.location);
</script>

I haven’t tested the above code, so you might need to mess a bit with it. Also note that the script needs improvement if the allowed site uses multiple subdomains.

]]>